4.5 Article

Synthesis of chiral N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand precursors and formation of ruthenium(II) complexes for transfer hydrogenation catalysts

期刊

POLYHEDRON
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 162-170

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2012.10.010

关键词

Hydrogenation; Transfer hydrogenation; N-Heterocyclic carbene ligands; Ruthenium complexes; Chiral ligands; Synthesis; Structural studies; Racemization; Amino acids as starting materials

资金

  1. NSF CAREER [CHE-0846383]
  2. ACS-PRF [48295-AC3]
  3. Drexel University
  4. NSF [0087210]
  5. Ohio Board of Regents [CAP-491]
  6. YSU
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Chemistry [0846383] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The S enantiomers of ester functionalized NHC ligand precursors, 1-[(2S)-1-ethoxy-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl]-3-ethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide (3a) and the methyl ester analog 3b, were synthesized from L-valine and fully characterized. The absolute stereochemistry of the chiral center was confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction (for 3a) and enantiopurity (of 3a and 3b) was determined by micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Deprotonation of this NHC ligand precursor (3a or 3b) and coordination to [RuCl2(p-cymene)](2) resulted in the isolation of a monodentate complex (with only NHC coordination) (4a or 4b) and a bidentate complex (5). In the bidentate complex, in addition to NHC coordination, a carboxylate donor group (from in situ hydrolysis of the ester) coordinates to Ru. All ruthenium complexes have been characterized by spectroscopic and analytical methods, plus single crystal X-ray diffraction for 4a and 5. The evidence shows that both Ru complexes are racemic, but with alternate synthetic methods perhaps racemization during complexation of 3a or 3b to metals could be avoided. The ruthenium complexes described herein serve as catalysts for ketone transfer hydrogenation in basic isopropanol. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据