4.5 Article

Synthesis, characterization and magnetostructural correlation studies on three binuclear copper complexes of pyrimidine derived Schiff base ligands

期刊

POLYHEDRON
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 2519-2528

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2008.05.009

关键词

binuclear copper(II) complex; ferromagnetic; anti ferromagnetic; pyrimidine derived Schiff base ligands; magnetostructural correlation

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India [F.30-65/2004(SR)]
  2. Fundacio Catalana per a la Recerca (FCR)
  3. Universitat de Barcelona
  4. [CTQ2006-01759]
  5. [CrQ2005-08123-C02-02/BQU]
  6. [2005SGR-00593, 2005SGR-00036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three binuclear Cu(II) complexes of two pyrimidine derived Schiff base ligands, 2-S-methyl-6-methyl-4-formyl pyrimidine-N(4)-ethyl thiosemicarbazone (HL1) and salicyl hydrazone of 2-hydrazino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine (HL2), have been prepared. HL1 produces a bis(p-thiolato) Cu(II) complex co-crystallizing with its mononuclear analog, [Cu-2(L-1)(2)(NO3)2][Cu(L-1)(NO3)] (1). On the other hand HL2 shows versatility by producing two different classes of binuclear Cu(II) complexes, a bis(mu-phenoxo) complex [Cu-2(L-2)(2)(NO3)(2)] (2) and another a (mu-4,4'-bipyridyl) complex, [Cu-2(L-2)(2)(mu-4,4'-bipyridyl)(NO3)(2)] (3) under suitable conditions. All the three complexes show distorted square pyramidal geometry around each Cu atom but to a varied extent. Magnetic behavior of complex 1 shows that it is strongly ferromagnetic in nature whereas compounds 2 and 3 are weakly antiferromagnetic in nature. A magnetostructural correlation study combined with molecular modelling on complexes I and 2 has thrown light on the difference on magnetic interaction between the Cu atoms in these two complexes. Various factors that may be responsible for such differences are also explored. A novel and potentially useful pH dependant conversion of 3 to 2 has also been noticed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据