4.3 Article

Structure of bryozoan communities in an Antarctic glacial fjord (Admiralty Bay, South Shetlands)

期刊

POLAR BIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 737-751

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-014-1474-1

关键词

King George Island; Suspension feeders; Bryozoa; Sublittoral; Biomass; Distribution patterns

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [51/N-IPY/2007/0]
  2. Census of Antarctic Marine Life Project
  3. University of Lodz
  4. Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute [40.2900.0903.18.0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bryozoans are among the most important groups of the Southern Ocean benthic macrofauna, both in terms of species richness and abundance. However, there is a considerable lack of ecological research focused on their distribution patterns and species richness on smaller scale, especially in the soft bottom habitats of Antarctic glacial fjords. The aim of this study was to describe those patterns in the Admiralty Bay. Forty-nine Van Veen grab samples were collected at the depth range from 15 to 265 m, in the summer season of 1979/1980, at three sites distributed along the main axis of the fjord. Among 53 identified species of bryozoans, 32 were recorded in the Admiralty Bay for the first time. The most common and abundant species were Himantozoum antarcticum, Inversiula nutrix and Nematoflustra flagellata. Genera such as Arachnopusia, Cellarinella and Osthimosia were the most speciose taxa. It was demonstrated that depth was important for the distribution of the bryozoans. More than half of the recorded species were found only below 70 m. An influence of glacial disturbance was reflected in the dominance structure of colony growth-forms. The inner region of the fjord was dominated almost entirely by encrusting species, while the diversity of bryozoan growth-forms in less disturbed areas was much higher. In those sites the highest percentage of branched, tuft like species represented by buguliform and flustriform zoaria was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据