4.3 Article

Foraging by little auks in the distant marginal sea ice zone during the chick-rearing period

期刊

POLAR BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 73-81

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-011-1034-x

关键词

Little Auk; Alle alle; Foraging range; Bimodal foraging strategy; Spitsbergen

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [1883/P01/2007/32, IPY/25/2007]
  2. Norwegian Financial Mechanism (ALKEKONGE) [PNRF-234-AI-1/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the chick-rearing period, little auks Alle alle adopt a bimodal foraging strategy, alternating long trips with several short ones. It has been postulated that they reach more remote areas during long feeding trips than during short ones. However, the range of their foraging flights has never actually been measured. The aims of this study were to find the exact location of the little auk feeding grounds and to investigate whether they reach remote areas during long foraging trips using miniature GPS and temperature loggers. The study was conducted in 2009 in Magdalenefjorden (79A degrees 34'N, 11A degrees 04'E), one of the main breeding grounds of little auks on Spitsbergen. The temperature logger records indicated that during short trips, little auks visit warmer waters (situated close to the colony) than during long ones. The tracks of two GPS-equipped birds indicated that during long trips little auks foraged in the distant, food-abundant marginal sea ice zone, at least 100 km away from the colony. During long trips, birds make several stops at sea, perhaps sampling the foraging area with respect to prey distribution. Since food conditions near the studied colony are usually suboptimal, little auks may be exploiting distant feeding areas to compensate for the poorer-quality food available at nearby foraging grounds. The extended duration of long foraging trips may enable birds to collect food for chicks on food-abundant, remote foraging grounds as well as acquire, process and excrete food needed for self-maintenance, reducing the costs of flight to the colony.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据