4.6 Article

Occupancy and detectability modelling of vertebrates in northern Australia using multiple sampling methods

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203304

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme through the Threatened Species Recovery Hub

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding where species occur and how difficult they are to detect during surveys is crucial for designing and evaluating monitoring programs, and has broader applications for conservation planning and management. In this study, we modelled occupancy and the effectiveness of six sampling methods at detecting vertebrates across the Top End of northern Australia. We fitted occupancy-detection models to 136 species (83 birds, 33 reptiles, 20 mammals) of 242 recorded during surveys of 333 sites in eight conservation reserves between 2011 and 2016. For modelled species, mean occupancy was highly variable: birds and reptiles ranged from 0.01-0.81 and 0.01-0.49, respectively, whereas mammal occupancy was lower, ranging from 0.02-0.30. Of the 11 environmental covariates considered as potential predictors of occupancy, topographic ruggedness, elevation, maximum temperature, and fire frequency were retained more readily in the top models. Using these models, we predicted species occupancy across the Top End of northern Australia (293,017 km(2)) and generated species richness maps for each species group. For mammals and reptiles, high richness was associated with rugged terrain, while bird richness was highest in coastal lowland woodlands. On average, detectability of diurnal birds was higher per day of surveys (0.33 +/- 0.09) compared with nocturnal birds per night of spotlighting (0.13 +/- 0.06). Detectability of reptiles was similar per day/night of pit trapping (0.30 +/- 0.09) as per night of spotlighting (0.29 +/- 0.11). On average, mammals were highly detectable using motion-sensor cameras for a week (0.36 +/- 0.06), with exception of smaller-bodied species. One night of Elliott trapping (0.20 +/- 0.06) and spotlighting (0.19 +/- 0.06) was more effective at detecting mammals than cage (0.08 +/- 0.03) and pit trapping (0.05 +/- 0.04). Our estimates of species occupancy and detectability will help inform decisions about how best to redesign a long-running vertebrate monitoring program in the Top End of northern Australia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据