4.6 Article

The distinct effects of orally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactococcus lactis subsp lactis C59 on gene expression in the murine small intestine

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188985

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (MAFF)
  2. Council for Science, Technology, and Innovation (CSTI)
  3. Cross-Ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP)
  4. Technologies for creating next generation agriculture, forestry, and fisheries (Japanese) (NARO) [14532924]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular mechanisms of strain-specific probiotic effects and the impact of the oral administration of probiotic strains on the host's gene expression are not yet well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the strain-specific effects of probiotic strain intake on gene expression in the murine small intestine. Two distinct strains of lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (GG) and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis C59 (C59), were orally administered to BALB/c mice, daily for 2 weeks. The total RNA was isolated from the upper (including the duodenum) and lower (the terminal ileum) small intestine, and gene expression was assessed by microarray analysis. The data revealed (1) oral administration of C59 and GG markedly down-regulated the expression of genes encoding fibrinogen subunits and plasminogen in the upper small intestine; (2) administration of more than 1 x 10(7) CFU/day of GG changed the gene expression of the host ileum. (3) strain-and dose-related effects on various GO biological processes; and (4) enrichment for B cell-related Gene Ontology terms among up-regulated genes in the terminal ileum of mice administered the 1 x 10(9) CFU/day of GG. The distinct effects of GG and C59 on gene expression in the intact small intestine provide clues to understand how the health beneficial effects of specific strains of probiotic bacteria are mediated by interactions with intestinal cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据