4.6 Article

Ocular biometric measurements in cataract surgery candidates in Portugal

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184837

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese research Grant through FCT-MEC [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0068/2011, UID/FIS/00068/2013]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal
  3. Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia PhD Grant
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0068/2011, UID/FIS/00068/2013]
  5. Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/FIS/00068/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Describe the ocular biometric parameters and their associations in a population of cataract surgery candidates. Methods A cross-sectional study of 13,012 eyes of 6,506 patients was performed. Biometric parameters of the eyes were measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry. The axial length (AL), mean keratometry (K) and astigmatism, anterior chamber depth (ACD) (epithelium to lens), lens thickness (LT), and Corneal Diameter (CD) were evaluated. Results The mean age was 69 +/- 10 years (44-99 years). Mean AL, Km, and ACD were 23.87 +/- 1.55 mm (19.8-31.92 mm), 43.91 +/- 1.71 D (40.61-51.14 D), and 3.25 +/- 0.44 mm (2.04-5.28 mm), respectively. The mean LT was 4.32 +/- 0.49 mm (2.73-5.77 mm) and the mean CD was 12.02 +/- 0.46 mm (10.50-14.15 mm). The mean corneal astigmatism was 1.08 +/- 0.84 D (0.00-7.58 D) and 43.5% of eyes had astigmatism >= 1.00 D. Male patients had longer AL and ACDs (p <.001) and flatter corneas (p <.001). In regression models considering age, gender, Km, ACD, LT, and CD, a longer AL was associated with being male and having higher ACD, LT and CD. Conclusions These data represent normative biometric values for the Portuguese population. The greatest predictor of ocular biometrics was gender. There was no significant correlation between age and AL, ACD, or Km. These results may be relevant in the evaluation of refractive error and in the calculation of intraocular lens power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据