4.6 Article

Interleukin-1 alpha and Interleukin-1 beta play a central role in the pathogenesis of fulminant hepatic failure in mice

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184084

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sheba Talipot Medical Leadership program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims Fulminant hepatitis failure (FHF) is marked by the sudden loss of hepatic function, with a severe life-threatening course in persons with no prior history of liver disease. Interleukin ( IL)-1 alpha and IL-1 beta are key inflammatory cytokines but little is known about their role in the development of FHF. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of IL-1 alpha and IL1 beta in the progression of LPS/GalN-induced FHF. Methods WT, IL-1 alpha or IL-1 beta deficient mice were injected with LPS/GalN. Blood and liver tissue were collected at different time points, FHF related pathways were examined. Results After FHF induction the survival of both IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta KO mice was longer than that of WT mice. Lower serum liver enzyme levels, demonstrated reduced hepatic injury in the IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta KO mice. Histologically detected liver injury and apoptotic hepatocytes were significantly reduced in the IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta KO mice compared to WT mice. Reduced hepatic I kappa B levels and upregulated NF kappa B activity in WT mice remained inhibited in IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta KO mice. Hepatic expression levels of TNF alpha and IL-6 were significantly increased in WT mice but not in IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta KO mice. Conclusions IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta play a central role in the pathogenesis of LPS/GalN-induced FHF. These interleukins are associated with the activation of NF.B signaling, upregulation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and liver damage and apoptosis. Since neither IL-1 alpha nor IL-1 beta depletions completely rescued the phenotype, we believe that IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta have a similar and probably complementary role in FHF progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据