4.6 Article

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with rs17337023 polymorphism and increased serum level of the EGFR protein

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180604

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Medical University Hospital in Taiwan [DMR-99-015, DMR-100-013, DMR-102-013]
  2. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [MOHW105-TDU-B-212-133019]
  3. National Science Council in Taiwan [NSC99-2314-B-039-005-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective We have previously described the association of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prevalence and two epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) SNPs (rs17337023 and rs2227983) among the Taiwanese population. This present study aimed to elucidate whether the SNPs can alter the expression of EGFR in the progression of RA. Methods The cohort study included 366 Taiwan's Han Chinese RA patients and 326 age and gender matched healthy controls. Blood samples collected from the participants were analyzed to determine their serum EGFR levels and to identify EGFR SNPs from their genomic DNA. Genotyping for EGFR SNPs was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay. The relationship between EGFR SNP and the clinical manifestations of RA was evaluated. Results Our results showed that a statistically significant difference in genotype frequency distributions at rs17337023 SNP for RA patients and controls (p < 0.05). In addition, compared with the haplotype frequencies between case and control groups, the RA patient with the GT haplotype appeared to be a significant protective haplotype compared with other haplotypes (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.91; p = 0.005). Furthermore, the increased serum level of EGFR was also observed in RA patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study showed that RA is associated with rs17337023 SNP in EGFR gene and increased serum level of the EGFR protein. These findings suggest EGFR is worthy of further investigation as a therapeutic target for RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据