4.6 Article

Control of the induction of type I interferon by Peste des petits ruminants virus

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177300

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Institute Strategic Programme on Livestock Viral Diseases at The Pirbright Institute
  3. Wellcome Trust [101792/Z/13/Z]
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/I/00001719, BBS/E/I/00001576] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/I/00001576, BBS/E/I/00001719] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Wellcome Trust [101792/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) is a morbillivirus that produces clinical disease in goats and sheep. We have studied the induction of interferon-beta (IFN-beta) following infection of cultured cells with wild-type and vaccine strains of PPRV, and the effects of such infection with PPRV on the induction of IFN-beta through both MDA-5 and RIG-I mediated pathways. Using both reporter assays and direct measurement of IFN-beta mRNA, we have found that PPRV infection induces IFN-beta only weakly and transiently, and the virus can actively block the induction of IFN-beta. We have also generated mutant PPRV that lack expression of either of the viral accessory proteins (V&C) to characterize the role of these proteins in IFN-beta induction during virus infection. Both PPRV_Delta V and PPRV_Delta C were defective in growth in cell culture, although in different ways. While the PPRV V protein bound to MDA-5 and, to a lesser extent, RIG-I, and over-expression of the V protein inhibited both IFN-beta induction pathways, PPRV lacking V protein expression can still block IFN-beta induction. In contrast, PPRV C bound to neither MDA-5 nor RIG-I, but PPRV lacking C protein expression lost the ability to block both MDA-5 and RIG-I mediated activation of IFN-beta. These results shed new light on the inhibition of the induction of IFN-beta by PPRV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据