4.8 Article

A hybrid living/organic electrochemical transistor based on the Physarum polycephalum cell endowed with both sensing and memristive properties

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 2859-2868

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4sc03425b

关键词

-

资金

  1. European project FP7-ICT-8 PhyChip-Physarum Chip: Growing Computers from Slime Mould [316366]
  2. Provincia Autonoma di Trento
  3. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Parma (CAR-IPARMA) - project BioNiMed (Multifunctional Hybrid Nanosystems for Biomedical Applications)
  4. N-Chem project within the CNR-NANOMAX Flagship program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid bio-organic electrochemical transistor was developed by interfacing an organic semiconductor, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with poly(styrene sulfonate), with the Physarum polycephalum cell. The system shows unprecedented performances since it could be operated both as a transistor, in a three-terminal configuration, and as a memristive device in a two terminal configuration mode. This is quite a remarkable achievement since, in the transistor mode, it can be used as a very sensitive bio-sensor directly monitoring biochemical processes occurring in the cell, while, as a memristive device, it represents one of the very first examples of a bio-hybrid system demonstrating such a property. Our system combines memory and sensing in the same system, possibly interfacing unconventional computing. The system was studied by a full electrical characterization using a series of different gate electrodes, namely made of Ag, Au and Pt, which typically show different operation modes in organic electrochemical transistors. Our experiment demonstrates that a remarkable sensing capability could potentially be implemented. We envisage that this system could be classified as a Bio-Organic Sensing/Memristive Device (BOSMD), where the dual functionality allows merging of the sensing and memory properties, paving the way to new and unexplored opportunities in bioelectronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据