4.8 Article

Visualizing electronic interactions between iron and carbon by X-ray chemical imaging and spectroscopy

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 3262-3267

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc00353a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21321002, 21303191]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09030100]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551131]
  4. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. University of Saskatchewan
  7. Government of Saskatchewan
  8. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  9. National Research Council Canada
  10. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic interaction of a catalyst and its support is of vital importance to its catalytic performance. However, it is still a great challenge to directly probe the interaction due to the lack of well-defined models and efficient technical means. In this study, we report that pod-like carbon nanotubes with encapsulated iron particles (Pod-Fe) and scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) can be used as an ideal model and technique to study the electronic interaction between carbon shells and iron particles. The chemical imaging and spectroscopy of Pod-Fe by STXM show that the local electronic structures at C K-edge near edge (pi*) of carbon shells can be significantly modified by the encapsulated iron particles, which promotes the adsorption of oxygen-containing species, and thereby further modifies the electronic structure (pi* and sigma*) of the carbon shells. Moreover, computed X-ray absorption near edge structure spectra (XANES) confirmed the electronic modifications of carbon shells by the encapsulated iron particles. The present study provides a direct evidence of electronic interactions with simultaneously collected images and spectra, which can promote the understanding towards the nature of active sites and supports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据