4.6 Article

The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167145

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft or DFG) through the Collaborative Research Center 974 [SFB 974]
  2. International Research Training Group 1902 Intra- and interorgan communication of the cardiovascular system [IRTG 1902]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) - German Network of RASopathy Research (GeNeRARe) [01GM1519D]
  4. European Network on Noonan Syndrome and Related Disorders (NSEuroNet) [01GM16026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RAS effectors specifically interact with the GTP-bound form of RAS in response to extracellular signals and link them to downstream signaling pathways. The molecular nature of effector interaction by RAS is well-studied but yet still incompletely understood in a comprehensive and systematic way. Here, structure-function relationships in the interaction between different RAS proteins and various effectors were investigated in detail by combining our in vitro data with in silico data. Equilibrium dissociation constants were determined for the binding of HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, RRAS1 and RRAS2 to both the RAS binding (RB) domain of CRAF and PI3K alpha, and the RAS association (RA) domain of RASSF5, RALGDS and PLC epsilon, respectively, using fluorescence polarization. An interaction matrix, constructed on the basis of available crystal structures, allowed identification of hotspots as critical determinants for RAS-effector interaction. New insights provided by this study are the dissection of the identified hotspots in five distinct regions (R1 to R5) in spite of high sequence variability not only between, but also within, RB/RA domain-containing effectors proteins. Finally, we propose that intermolecular beta-sheet interaction in R1 is a central recognition region while R3 may determine specific contacts of RAS versus RRAS isoforms with effectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据