4.6 Article

Reproductive Biology of Albacore Tuna (Thunnus alalunga) in the Western Indian Ocean

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168605

关键词

-

资金

  1. Allocations de Recherche pour une These au Sud (ARTS) programme of the French Institute of Research for Development (IRD)
  2. Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA)
  3. European Data Collection Framework (EU DCF project) [199/2008, 665/2008]
  4. Fisheries European Funds (EU FEP) [759/DMSOI/2013]
  5. Seychelles Fishing Authority (SFA)
  6. University of Mauritius

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reproductive biology of albacore tuna, Thunnus alalunga, in the western Indian Ocean was examined through analysis of the sex ratio, spawning season, length-at-maturity (L-50), spawning frequency and fecundity. From 2013 to 2015, a total of 923 female and 867 male albacore were sampled. A bias in sex ratio was found in favor of females with fork length (L-F) < 100 cm. Using histological analyses and gonadosomatic index, spawning was found to occur between 10 degrees S and 30 degrees S, mainly to the east of Madagascar from October to January. Large females contributed more to reproduction through their longer spawning period compared to small individuals. The L-50 (mean standard error) of female albacore was estimated at 85.3 +/- 0.7 cm LF. Albacore spawn on average every 2.2 days within the spawning region and spawning months, from November to January. Batch fecundity ranged between 0.26 and 2.09 million oocytes and the relative batch fecundity (mean standard deviation) was estimated at 53.4 +/- 23.2 oocytes g(-1) of somatic-gutted weight. The study provides new information on the reproductive development and classification of albacore in the western Indian Ocean. The reproductive parameters will reduce uncertainty in current stock assessment models which will eventually assist the fishery to be sustainable for future generations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据