4.6 Article

Tetrabromobisphenol A Is an Efficient Stabilizer of the Transthyretin Tetramer

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153529

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Parkinsofonden
  3. Insamlingsstiftelsen at Umea University
  4. Alzheimerfonden
  5. Ahlen-stiftelsen
  6. J.C. Kempes stiftelse
  7. Hjarnfonden
  8. O.E. och Edlas stiftelse
  9. Torsten Soderbergs stiftelse
  10. Vasterbottens Lans lasting (ALF-medel)
  11. Patientforeningen FAMY/AMYL
  12. Medical Faculty of Umea University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid formation of the human plasma protein transthyretin (TTR) is associated with several human disorders, including familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) and senile systemic amyloidosis. Dissociation of TTR's native tetrameric assembly is the rate-limiting step in the conversion into amyloid, and this feature presents an avenue for intervention because binding of an appropriate ligand to the thyroxin hormone binding sites of TTR stabilizes the native tetrameric assembly and impairs conversion into amyloid. The desired features for an effective TTR stabilizer include high affinity for TTR, high selectivity in the presence of other proteins, no adverse side effects at the effective concentrations, and a long half-life in the body. In this study we show that the commonly used flame retardant tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) efficiently stabilizes the tetrameric structure of TTR. The X-ray crystal structure shows TBBPA binding in the thyroxine binding pocket with bromines occupying two of the three halogen binding sites. Interestingly, TBBPA binds TTR with an extremely high selectivity in human plasma, and the effect is equal to the recently approved drug tafamidis and better than diflunisal, both of which have shown therapeutic effects against FAP. TBBPA consequently present an interesting scaffold for drug design. Its absorption, metabolism, and potential side-effects are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据