4.6 Article

Effects of the Commercial Flame Retardant Mixture DE-71 on Cytokine Production by Human Immune Cells

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154621

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk foundation [13495, F-22222-1, 8005, 14266]
  2. Arvid Nilsson's Fund
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research [0602-01959B]
  4. Danish Foundation Musikforlaeggernes Agnes og Knut Morks fond
  5. [R129-A4222]
  6. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF15OC0014622, NNF14OC0013495] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Although production of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) is now banned, release from existing products will continue for many years. The PBDEs are assumed to be neurotoxic and toxic to endocrine organs at low concentrations. Their effect on the immune system has not been investigated thoroughly. We aimed to investigate the influence of DE-71 on cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stimulated with Escherichia Coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or phytohaemagglutinin-L (PHA-L). Material and Methods PBMCs isolated from healthy donors were pre-incubated with DE-71 at various concentrations and subsequently incubated with the monocyte stimulator LPS, or the T-cell activator PHA-L. Interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, IL-17A, and IL-17F were quantified in the supernatants by Luminex kits. Results At non-cytotoxic concentrations (0.01-10 mu g/mL), DE-71 significantly enhanced secretion of IL-1 beta, IL-6, CXCL8, IL-10 and TNF-alpha, (p = <0.001-0.043; n = 6) from LPS-stimulated PBMCs. IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-17A, and IL-17F (p = < 0.001-0.043; n = 6) secretion were enhanced from PHA-L-stimulated PBMCs as well. Secretion of IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-10, IL-8 and IL-6 was not significantly affected by DE-71. Conclusions We demonstrate an enhancing effect of DE-71 on cytokine production by normal human PBMCs stimulated with LPS or PHA-L ex vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据