4.5 Article

Male patients with terminal renal failure exhibit low serum levels of antimullerian hormone

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 149-153

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.135124

关键词

antimullerian hormone; chronic kidney disease; end-stage renal disease; infertility; inhibin B; sex hormones

资金

  1. Fulbright Commission
  2. Faculty of Medicine at Lund University
  3. Research Funds of Region Skane
  4. Research Fund of Malmo University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Male reproductive function is impaired during end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Disturbance of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, and therefore the regulation of sex hormones, is one of the major causes. Our focus was to include antimullerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B concentrations. Twenty male patients on hemodialysis, median age 40 (26-48) years, were analyzed for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), testosterone, estradiol, AMH and inhibin B levels. We used 144 proven fertile men, median age 32 (19-44) years as a control group and analyzed differences using multiple linear regression. Males with ESRD demonstrated higher mean values for prolactin, 742 versus normal 210 mIE l(1) (95% confidence interval (CI): 60.3, 729), LH, 8.87 versus normal 4.5 IE l(1) (95% CI: 2.75, 6.14), and estradiol 89.7 versus normal 79.0 pmol l(1) (95% CI: 1.31, 0.15). Mean value for AMH was lower, 19.5 versus normal 47.3 pmol l(1) (95% CI: 37.6, 11.6). There were no differences found for FSH, SHBG, inhibin B and testosterone. The most important difference was found for AMH, a marker of Sertoli cell function in the testes, which decreased by close to 60% when compared with controls. Combined with an increase in LH, these findings may indicate a dysfunction of Sertoli cells and an effect on Leydig cells contributing to a potential mechanism of reproductive dysfunction in men with ESRD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据