4.6 Article

Combined IVUS and NIRS Detection of Fibroatheromas Histopathological Validation in Human Coronary Arteries

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 184-194

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.021

关键词

fibroatheroma; imaging; intravascular ultrasound; near-infrared spectroscopy

资金

  1. Boston Scientific
  2. InfraReDx
  3. Acist
  4. Volcano Corporation
  5. Boston Scientific China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES This study assessed grayscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detection of a histological fibroatheroma (FA). BACKGROUND NIRS-detected, lipid-rich plaques (LRPs) and IVUS-detected attenuated plaques are considered to be vulnerable. METHODS IVUS-attenuated plaque and NIRS-LRP (yellow or tan block chemogram) were compared with histopathology in 1,943 sections of 103 coronary arteries from 56 autopsied hearts. 6:1 CmssMuk RESULTS IVUS-superficial attenuation and NIRS-LRP showed a similar high specificity of approximately 95%, whereas IVUS-superficial attenuation alone had a poor sensitivity (vs. NIRS-LRP) in detecting FAs (36% vs. 47%; p = 0.001). Compared with FA sections with superficial attenuation, FA sections without superficial attenuation had a smaller plaque burden (57.1% vs. 67.7%), a larger arc of calcium (79.7 degrees vs. 16.8 degrees), and a tower prevalence of a >= 20% histological necrotic core (28% vs. 50%) or late FA (14% vs. 37%; all p < 0.05). Compared with FA sections with NIRS-LRP, FA sections without NIRS-LRP showed a smaller plaque burden (58.0% vs. 63.3%) and a tower prevalence of a a >= 20% necrotic core (27% vs. 46%). Conversely, non-FAs with NIRS-LRP (vs. non-FAs without LRP) showed a larger plaque burden (55.1% vs. 46.3%), a greater prevalence of a >= 20% histological lipid pool (34% vs. 5%), and mostly pathological intimal thickening (50%) or fibrocalcific plaque (33%). When sections showed either IVUS attenuation or NIRS-LRP, the sensitivity for predicting a FA was significantly higher compared with IVUS attenuation alone (63% vs. 36%; p < 0.001) or NIRS-LRP alone (63% vs. 47%; p < 0.001). When sections showed both IVUS attenuation and NIRS-LRP, the positive predictive value improved compared with IVUS attenuation alone (84% vs. 66%; p < 0.001) or NIRS-LRP alone (84% vs. 65%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS NIRS-LRP was more accurate than IVUS for predicting plaque containing a necrotic core or a large lipid pool, and the combination was more accurate than either alone. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据