4.6 Article

A Clinical Model to Identify Patients With High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 427-434

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.015

关键词

computed tomographic coronary angiography; high-risk coronary artery disease; risk factors

资金

  1. GE Healthcare
  2. TeraRecon Inc.
  3. Siemens
  4. Bayer Schering Pharma
  5. Bayer Pharma
  6. Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Care Network of Michigan
  7. Siemens Healthcare
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation
  9. GE HealthcareSiemens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to develop a clinical model that identifies patients with and without high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Although current clinical models help to estimate a patient's pre-test probability of obstructive CAD, they do not accurately identify those patients with and without high-risk coronary anatomy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multinational coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) cohort was conducted. High-risk anatomy was defined as left main diameter stenosis >= 50%, 3-vessel disease with diameter stenosis >= 70%, or 2-vessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. Using a cohort of 27,125, patients with a history of CAD, cardiac transplantation, and congenital heart disease were excluded. The model was derived from 24,251 consecutive patients in the derivation cohort and an additional 7,333 nonoverlapping patients in the validation cohort. RESULTS: The risk score consisted of 9 variables: age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, family history of CAD, history of peripheral vascular disease, and chest pain symptoms. Patients were divided into 3 risk categories: low (<= 7 points), intermediate (8 to 17 points) and high (>= 18 points). The model was statistically robust with area under the curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.78) in the derivation cohort and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.74) in the validation cohort. Patients who scored <= 7 points had a low negative likelihood ratio (<0.1), whereas patients who scored >= 18 points had a high specificity of 99.3% and a positive likelihood ratio (8.48). In the validation group, the prevalence of high-risk CAD was 1% in patients with <= 7 points and 16.7% in those with >= 18 points. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a scoring system, based on clinical variables, that can be used to identify patients at high and low pre-test probability of having high-risk CAD. Identification of these populations may detect those who may benefit from a trial of medical therapy and those who may benefit most from an invasive strategy. (C) 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据