4.6 Article

Copy Number Variation Screen Identifies a Rare De Novo Deletion at Chromosome 15q13.1-13.3 in a Child with Language Impairment

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134997

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society Research Grant [RG110387]
  2. Wellcome Trust Programme Grant [WT082032MA]
  3. Wellcome Trust [090532/Z/09/Z, 097831/Z/11/Z]
  4. Medical Research Council Hub Grant [G0900747 91070]
  5. MRC [G1000569/1, MR/J003719/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust Vacation Scholarship
  7. Wellcome Trust [097831/Z/11/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  8. MRC [MR/J003719/1, G1000569] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/J003719/1, G1000569] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A significant proportion of children (up to 7% in the UK) present with pronounced language difficulties that cannot be explained by obvious causes like other neurological and medical conditions. A substantial genetic component is predicted to underlie such language problems. Copy number variants (CNVs) have been implicated in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, such as autism and schizophrenia, but it is not fully established to what extent they might contribute to language disorders. We conducted a CNV screen in a longitudinal cohort of young children with language-related difficulties (n = 85), focusing on single events at candidate loci. We detected a de novo deletion on chromosome 15q13.1-13.3. The adjacent 15q11-13.1 locus is disrupted in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes, while disruptions across the breakpoints (BP1-BP6) have previously been implicated in different neurodevelopmental phenotypes including autism, intellectual disability (ID), seizures and developmental delay (DD). This is the first report of a deletion at BP3-BP5 being linked to a deficit confined to language impairment, in the absence of ID, expanding the range of phenotypes that implicate the chromosome 15q13 locus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据