4.6 Article

Relationship between Eating Disturbance and Dementia Severity in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133666

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [23591718]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [24249100]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25245068, 26461750, 23591718] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Eating is one of the most important daily activities in managing patients with dementia. Although various eating disturbance occur as dementia progresses, to our knowledge, most of the studies focused on a part of eating disturbance such as swallowing and appetite. There have been few comprehensive studies including eating habits and food preference in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aims of this study were to investigate almost all eating disturbance and to examine the relationship of eating disturbance to dementia stage in AD. Methods A total of 220 patients with AD and 30 normal elderly (NE) subjects were recruited. Eating disturbance was assessed by a comprehensive questionnaire that had been previously validated. Potential relationships between the characteristics of eating disturbance and dementia stage as classified by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) were assessed. Results Overall, 81.4% of patients with AD showed some eating and swallowing disturbance, whereas only 26.7% of the NE subjects had such a disturbance. Even in an early stage, patients with AD hadmany types of eating disturbance; Appetite change was shown in nearly half of the mild AD patients (49.5%). In the moderate stage, the scores of change of eating habits and food preference were highest, and in the severe stage swallowing disturbance became critical. Conclusion In AD, the relationship of dementia stage to eating disturbance differs according to the type of eating disturbance. The relationships between various eating disturbance and the severity of dementia should be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据