4.6 Article

Immunostimulatory Effects Triggered by Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 Probiotic Strain Involve Activation of Dendritic Cells and Interferon-Gamma Production

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127262

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Buenos Aires, Argentina [20020100101002]
  2. Institute of Infection Immunology (Twincore, Hannover, Germany)
  3. Institute of Infection Immunology (Twincore, Hannover, Germany) [PROALAR DA/10/05]
  4. Laboratorio de Modulacion de la Respuesta Inmune, (IDEHU, CONICET-UBA, Argentina) [PROALAR DA/10/05]
  5. Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation (MINCyT, Argentina)
  6. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Probiotics can modulate the immune system, conferring beneficial effects on the host. Understanding how these microorganisms contribute to improve the health status is still a challenge. Previously, we have demonstrated that Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121 implants itself and persists in the murine gastrointestinal tract, and enhances and skews the profile of cytokines towards the Th1 phenotype in several biological models. Given the importance of dendritic cells (DCs) in the orchestration of immunity, the aim of this work was to elucidate the influence of E. faecalis CECT7121 on DCs and the outcome of the immune responses. In this work we show that E. faecalis CECT7121 induces a strong dose-dependent activation of DCs and secretion of high levels of IL-12, IL-6, TNF alpha, and IL-10. This stimulation is dependent on TLR signaling, and skews the activation of T cells towards the production of IFN gamma. The influence of this activation in the establishment of Th responses in vivo shows the accumulation of specific IFN gamma-producing cells. Our findings indicate that the activation exerted by E. faecalis CECT7121 on DCs and its consequence on the cellular adaptive immune response may have broad therapeutic implications in immunomodulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据