4.6 Article

NLRP3 Inflammasome Is Expressed and Functional in Mouse Brain Microglia but Not in Astrocytes

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130624

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Fund Luxembourg [C11/BM/1198303]
  2. AFR grant from the National Research Fund Luxembourg [1076532]
  3. Fondation du Pelican de Mie et Pierre Hippert-Faber under the aegis of Fondation de Luxembourg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroinflammation is the local reaction of the brain to infection, trauma, toxic molecules or protein aggregates. The brain resident macrophages, microglia, are able to trigger an appropriate response involving secretion of cytokines and chemokines, resulting in the activation of astrocytes and recruitment of peripheral immune cells. IL-1 beta plays an important role in this response; yet its production and mode of action in the brain are not fully understood and its precise implication in neurodegenerative diseases needs further characterization. Our results indicate that the capacity to form a functional NLRP3 inflammasome and secretion of IL-1 beta is limited to the microglial compartment in the mouse brain. We were not able to observe IL-1 beta secretion from astrocytes, nor do they express all NLRP3 inflammasome components. Microglia were able to produce IL-1 beta in response to different classical inflammasome activators, such as ATP, Nigericin or Alum. Similarly, microglia secreted IL-18 and IL-1 alpha, two other inflammasome-linked pro-inflammatory factors. Cell stimulation with alpha-synuclein, a neurodegenerative disease-related peptide, did not result in the release of active IL-1 beta by microglia, despite a weak pro-inflammatory effect. Amyloid-beta peptides were able to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in microglia and IL-1 beta secretion occurred in a P2X7 receptor-independent manner. Thus microglia-dependent inflammasome activation can play an important role in the brain and especially in neuroinflammatory conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据