4.6 Article

HIF-1α Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Metastasis through Direct Regulation of ZEB1 in Colorectal Cancer

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129603

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172057, 81302159]
  2. President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University [2012C003, 2012B009]
  3. high-level topic matching funds of Nanfang Hospital [G201227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well recognized that hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) is involved in cancer metastasis, chemotherapy and poor prognosis. We previously found that deferoxamine, a hypoxia-mimetic agent, induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in colorectal cancer. Therefore, here we explored a new molecular mechanism for HIF-1 alpha contributing to EMT and cancer metastasis through binding to ZEB1. In this study, we showed that overexpression of HIF-1 alpha with adenovirus infection promoted EMT, cell invasion and migration in vitro and in vivo. On a molecular level, HIF-1 alpha directly binding to the proximal promoter of ZEB1 via hypoxia response element (HRE) sites thus increasing the transactivity and expression of ZEB1. In addition, inhibition of ZEB1 was able to abrogate the HIF-1 alpha-induced EMT and cell invasion. HIF-1 alpha expression was highly correlated with the expression of ZEB1 in normal colorectal epithelium, primary and metastatic CRC tissues. Interestingly, both HIF-1a and ZEB1 were positively associated with Vimentin, an important mesenchymal marker of EMT, whereas negatively associated with E-cadherin expression. These findings suggest that HIF-1 alpha enhances EMT and cancer metastasis by binding to ZEB1 promoter in CRC. HIF-1 alpha and ZEB1 are both widely considered as tumor-initiating factors, but our results demonstrate that ZEB1 is a direct downstream of HIF-1 alpha, suggesting a novel molecular mechanism for HIF-1 alpha-inducing EMT and cancer metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据