4.6 Article

Mitogenomes from The 1000 Genome Project Reveal New Near Eastern Features in Present-Day Tuscans

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119242

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF2011-26983]
  2. Plan Galego IDT
  3. Xunta de Galicia [EM 2012/045]
  4. Conselleria de Sanidade/Xunta de Galicia [RHI07/2, 10PXIB918184PR]
  5. Instituto Carlos III (Intensificacion de la Actividad Investigadora)
  6. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS) of the Plan Nacional de I+D+I and 'fondos FEDER' (F.M.T.) [PI070069, PI1000540]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Genetic analyses have recently been carried out on present-day Tuscans (Central Italy) in order to investigate their presumable recent Near East ancestry in connection with the long-standing debate on the origins of the Etruscan civilization. We retrieved mitogenomes and genome-wide SNP data from 110 Tuscans analyzed within the context of The 1000 Genome Project. For phylogeographic and evolutionary analysis we made use of a large worldwide database of entire mitogenomes (>26,000) and partial control region sequences (>180,000). Results Different analyses reveal the presence of typical Near East haplotypes in Tuscans representing isolated members of various mtDNA phylogenetic branches. As a whole, the Near East component in Tuscan mitogenomes can be estimated at about 8%; a proportion that is comparable to previous estimates but significantly lower than admixture estimates obtained from autosomal SNP data (21%). Phylogeographic and evolutionary inter-population comparisons indicate that the main signal of Near Eastern Tuscan mitogenomes comes from Iran. Conclusions Mitogenomes of recent Near East origin in present-day Tuscans do not show local or regional variation. This points to a demographic scenario that is compatible with a recent arrival of Near Easterners to this region in Italy with no founder events or bottlenecks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据