4.6 Article

Intermediary Metabolite Precursor Dimethyl-2-Ketoglutarate Stabilizes Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α by Inhibiting Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase PHD2

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113865

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Research [R01DE10742, R01DE14183]
  2. The Mary Kay Foundation [005-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha), a major mediator of tumor physiology, is activated during tumor progression, and its abundance is correlated with therapeutic resistance in a broad range of solid tumors. The accumulation of HIF-1 alpha is mainly caused by hypoxia or through the mutated succinate dehydrogenase A (SDHA) or fumarate hydratase (FH) expression to inhibit its degradation. However, its activation under normoxic conditions, termed pseudohypoxia, in cells without mutated SDHA or FH is not well documented. Here, we show that dimethyl-2-ketoglutarate (DKG), a cell membrane-permeable precursor of a key metabolic intermediate, alpha-ketoglutarate (alpha-KG), known for its ability to rescue glutamine deficiency, transiently stabilized HIF-1 alpha by inhibiting activity of the HIF prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein, PHD2. Consequently, prolonged DKG-treatment under normoxia elevated HIF-1 alpha abundance and up-regulated the expression of its downstream target genes, thereby inducing a pseudohypoxic condition. This HIF-1 alpha stabilization phenotype is similar to that from treatment of cells with desferrioxamine (DFO), an iron chelator, or dimethyloxalyglycine (DMOG), an established PHD inhibitor, but was not recapitulated with other alpha-KG analogues, such as Octyl-2KG, MPTOM001 and MPTOM002. Our study is the first example of an alpha-KG precursor to increase HIF-1 alpha abundance and activity. We propose that DKG acts as a potent HIF-1 alpha activator, highlighting the potential use of DKG to investigate the contribution of PHD2-HIF-1 alpha pathway to tumor biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据