4.6 Article

Tracing the Trans-Pacific Evolutionary History of a Domesticated Seaweed (Gracilaria chilensis) with Archaeological and Genetic Data

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114039

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Cooperation for Development INCO-DEV Programme (INCO-EPIFIGHT) [ICA4-CT- 2001-10021]
  2. French National Research Agency [ANR-10-BTBR-04-02]
  3. CONICYT
  4. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  5. Gobierno de Chile (Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico FONDECYT) [1090360, 1130868]
  6. Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio (ICM) [P10-033F]
  7. European Network of Excellence 'Marine Genomics' (Algal Node)
  8. 'ARCUS' programme of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  9. International Research Network Diversity, Evolution and Biotechnology of Marine Algae'' (GDRI) [0803]
  10. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Coasts & Oceans CORE funding [COBR1401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The history of a domesticated marine macroalga is studied using archaeological, phylogeographic and population genetic tools. Phylogeographic and population genetic analyses demonstrated that the cultivated red alga Gracilaria chilensis colonised the Chilean coast from New Zealand. Combining archaeological observations with phylogeographic data provided evidence that exchanges between New Zealand and Chile have occurred at least before the Holocene, likely at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and we suggest that migration probably occurred via rafting. Furthermore, the remarkably low microsatellite diversity found in the Chilean populations compared to those in New Zealand is consistent with a recent genetic bottleneck as a result of over-exploitation of natural populations and/or the process of domestication. Therefore, the aquaculture of this seaweed, based essentially on clonal propagation, is occurring from genetically depressed populations and may be driving the species to an extinction vortex in Chile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据