4.6 Article

Metabolomics Evaluation of Serum Markers for Cachexia and Their Intra- Day Variation in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113259

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26860504] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by progressive loss of weight and muscle atrophy. Using metabolomics, we investigated serum markers and their intra-day variation in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with cachexia. Methods: Patients were enrolled in two groups: those with or without cachexia. Blood samples collected at 6: 30 AM, 11: 30 AM, 4: 30 PM, and 9: 30 PM were analyzed using metabolomics, and serum levels of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and leptin were measured and compared between the two groups. Intra-day variation was then evaluated. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled in total. In the cachexia group (n = 9), median body weight loss rate over 6 months was greater, performance status was poorer, and anorexia was more severe than in the non-cachexia group (n = 12). Each metabolites level showed substantial intra-day variation, and some of them displayed significant differences between the two groups. Levels of paraxanthine remained markedly lower in the cohort with cachexia at all measurement points. Besides, median IL-6 and TNF-alpha levels appeared higher and leptin concentration appeared lower in the cachexia group, albeit without statistical significance. Conclusion: Some metabolites and some serological marker levels were affected by cancer cachexia. Although paraxanthine levels were consistently lower in patients with cachexia, we identified that many metabolites indicated large intra- and inter-day variation and that it might be necessary to pay attention to intra-day variation in metabolomics research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据