4.6 Article

11C-Acetate PET Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111598

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [23592089]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23592089, 25860712] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Activation of glial cells is a cardinal feature in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology, and acetate has been reported to be selectively uptaken by astrocytes in the CNS. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of PET with C-11-acetate for MS diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Six patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 6 healthy volunteers (HV) were enrolled. The C-11-acetate brain uptake on PET was measured in patients with MS and HV. Volume-of-interest analysis of cerebral gray and white matter based on the segmentation technique for co-registered MRI and voxel-based statistical parametric analysis were performed. Correlation between C-11-acetate uptake and the lesion number in T1-and T2-weighted MR images were also assessed. Results: The standardized uptake value (SUV) of C-11-acetate was increased in both white and gray matter in MS patients compared to HV. Voxel-based statistical analysis revealed a significantly increased SUV relative to that in the bilateral thalami (SUVt) in a broad area of white matter, particularly in the subcortical white matter of MS patients. The numbers of T2 lesions and T1 black holes were significantly correlated with SUV of C-11-acetate in white and gray matter. Conclusions: The C-11-acetate uptake significantly increased in MS patients and correlated to the number of MRI lesions. These preliminary data suggest that C-11-acetate PET can be a useful clinical examination for MS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据