4.6 Article

Relationship between Air Pollutants and Economic Development of the Provincial Capital Cities in China during the Past Decade

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0477]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100348]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  5. China's QianRen program
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0477]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100348]
  9. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  10. China's QianRen program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the economic development of China, air pollutants are also growing rapidly in recent decades, especially in big cities of the country. To understand the relationship between economic condition and air pollutants in big cities, we analysed the socioeconomic indictorssuch as Gross Regional Product per capita (GRP per capita), the concentration of air pollutants (PM10, SO2, NO2) and the air pollution index (API) from 2003 to 2012 in 31 provincial capitals of mainland China. The three main industries had a quadratic correlation with NO2, but a negative relationship with PM10 and SO2. The concentration of air pollutants per ten thousand yuan decreased with the multiplying of GRP in the provinical cities. The concentration of air pollutants and API in the provincial capital cities showed a declining trend or inverted-U trend with the rise of GRP per capita, which provided a strong evidence for the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC), that the environmental quality first declines, then improves, with the income growth. The results of this research improved our understanding of the alteration of atmospheric quality with the increase of social economy and demonstrated the feasibility of sustainable development for China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据