4.5 Article

Association of HLA-B*41:02 with Henoch-Schonlein Purpura (IgA Vasculitis) in Spanish individuals irrespective of the HLA-DRB1 status

期刊

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0622-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. 'Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias' (Spain) [PI12/00193]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III at the Spanish Ministry of Health (Spain) [CD12/00425]
  3. RETICS Program (RIER) [RD12/0009/0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: A study was conducted to determine whether the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B alleles are implicated in the susceptibility to Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP) in the largest series of Caucasian HSP patients ever assessed for genetic studies. Methods: The study population was composed of 349 Spanish patients diagnosed with HSP fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology and the Michel et al. classification criteria, and 335 sex and ethnically matched controls. HLA-B phenotypes were determined by sequencing-based typing (SBT) and analyzed by chi-square or Fisher exact test. Results: A statistically significant increase of HLA-B*41:02 allele in HSP patients when compared with controls was found (8.3% versus 1.5% respectively; P = 0.0001; OR (odds ratio) = 5.76 [2.15-19.3]). These results remained statistically significant after adjusting for Bonferroni correction (P = 0.0028). An internal validation also confirmed the susceptibility effect on HSP associated with HLA-B*41:02 (OR = 5.70 [1.98-16.44]). Since a former study described an association between HLA-DRB1*01:03 and HSP susceptibility, we also evaluated the implication of HLA-B*41:02 independently of HLA-DRB1*01:03. Interestingly, the association remained statistically significant (P = 0.0004, OR = 4.97 [1.8-16.9]). No HLA-B association with specific HSP clinical features was found. Conclusions: Our study indicates that HLA-B*41:02 is associated with the susceptibility to HSP in Spanish patients irrespective of HLA-DRB1 status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据