4.4 Article

Use of Nondrug, Nonoperative Interventions by Community-Dwelling People With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis

期刊

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 305-309

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22395

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health & Medical Research Council [628556, 631717, 628644]
  2. Australian Health Management
  3. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveGuidelines recommend nondrug, nonoperative treatments as the first-line approach for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet there is limited data regarding use of these treatments in OA. This study describes the use of nondrug, nonoperative interventions in people with hip and knee OA. MethodsA convenience sample of 591 people with hip or knee OA completed a questionnaire indicating their past and/or current use of 17 nondrug, nonoperative interventions each for their hip or knee OA. Descriptive analyses, based on frequency counts and proportions, and chi-square tests described the use of each intervention in the total cohort, and within subgroups of knee and hip OA. ResultsParticipants were currently using a mean SD of 0.8 +/- 0.9 of the strongly recommended interventions. Making efforts to lose weight (50%, n = 294) and shoe orthoses (30%, n = 175) were the most common currently used interventions. Strengthening (26%, n = 152) and stretching exercises (23%, n = 133) were the most common interventions that participants had tried in the past but were no longer utilizing. Of note, 12% (n = 71) had never used any of the interventions. Use of 5 treatments (shoe orthoses, heat and/or cold, muscle strengthening exercises, walking aids, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) was significantly different between the hip and knee cohorts (P < 0.05). ConclusionUse of nondrug, nonoperative interventions was low among people with hip and knee OA. Our findings show evidence-practice gaps, particularly with respect to the interventions most strongly recommended in clinical guidelines for hip and knee OA (weight loss and exercise).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据