4.6 Article

Impact of Acetazolamide and CPAP on Cortical Activity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093931

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Zurich Research Priority Program (URPP Integrative Human Physiology)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. Lung League Zurich
  4. Center for Clinical Research, University of Zurich
  5. Center for Clinical Research, University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: 1) To investigate the impact of acetazolamide, a drug commonly prescribed for altitude sickness, on cortical oscillations in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). 2) To examine alterations in the sleep EEG after short- term discontinuation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Design: Data from two double- blind, placebo- controlled randomized cross- over design studies were analyzed. Setting: Polysomnographic recordings in sleep laboratory at 490 m and at moderate altitudes in the Swiss Alps: 1630 or 1860 m and 2590 m. Patients: Study 1: 39 OSAS patients. Study 2: 41 OSAS patients. Interventions: Study 1: OSAS patients withdrawn from treatment with CPAP. Study 2: OSAS patients treated with autoCPAP. Treatment with acetazolamide (500-750 mg) or placebo at moderate altitudes. Measurements and Results: An evening dose of 500 mg acetazolamide reduced slow-wave activity (SWA; approximately 10%) and increased spindle activity (approximately 10%) during non-REM sleep. In addition, alpha activity during wake after lights out was increased. An evening dose of 250 mg did not affect these cortical oscillations. Discontinuation of CPAP therapy revealed a reduction in SWA (5-10%) and increase in beta activity (approximately 25%). \Conclusions: The higher evening dose of 500 mg acetazolamide showed the `` spectral fingerprint'' of Benzodiazepines, while 250 mg acetazolamide had no impact on cortical oscillations. However, both doses had beneficial effects on oxygen saturation and sleep quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据