4.5 Article

Band selection using sparse nonnegative matrix factorization with the thresholded Earth's mover distance for hyperspectral imagery classification

期刊

EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 907-918

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-014-0201-3

关键词

Band selection; Sparse nonnegative matrix factorization; Thresholded earth's mover distance; Hyperspectral imagery; Classification

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41401389, 41171073, 41471004]
  2. Research Project of Zhejiang Educational Committee [Y201430436]
  3. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2014A610173]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Y5110321]
  5. Discipline Construction Project of Ningbo University [ZX2014000400]
  6. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sparse nonnegative matrix factorization method with the thresholded ground distance (SNMF-TEMD) is proposed to solve the band selection problem in hyperspectral imagery (HSI) classification. The SNMF-TEMD assumes that band vectors are sampled from a union of low-dimensional subspaces and approximates a HSI data matrix with the product of a basis matrix constructed from subspaces and a sparse coefficient matrix. The SNMF-TEMD utilizes the TEMD metric to better measures approximation errors during the optimization of HSI data factorization. The TEMD metric makes up the theoretical drawbacks in the Euclidean distance (ED) and Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) metrics when measuring the approximation errors in HSI datasets. The SNMF-TEMD is solved by the combination of min-cost-flow algorithm and multiplicative update rules. The band cluster assignments are found according to positions of largest entries in columns of the coefficient matrix and the desired band subset constitutes with the bands closest to their cluster centers. Three groups of experiments on two HSI datasets are performed to explore the performance of SNMF-TEMD. Four popular band selection methods are used to make comparisons: affinity propagation (AP), maximum-variance principal component analysis (MVPCA), SNMF with ED metric (SNMF-ED) and SNMF with KLD metric (SNMF-KLD). Experimental results show that SNMF-TEMD outperforms all four methods in classification accuracy and its computational speed is slower than SNMF-ED and SNMF-KLD. SNMF-TEMD is a better choice for band selection among all five methods because of its overwhelming advantage in classification and the popular speed remedy scheme from parallel computing and high-performance computers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据