4.6 Article

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array-Based Karyotyping of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100245

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rio Hortega [CM10/00321, CM11/00343]
  2. Health Research Program [PI12/01047]
  3. program Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer'' [RD12/0036/0014]
  4. Red Cooperativa de Biobancos Hospitalarios'' from Instituto de Salud Carlos III'', Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain [RD09/0076/00021]
  5. Instituto Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital La Fe'' [2013/0327]
  6. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2011/025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by the t(15; 17)(q22; q21), but additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACA) and other rearrangements can contribute in the development of the whole leukemic phenotype. We hypothesized that some ACA not detected by conventional techniques may be informative of the onset of APL. We performed the high-resolution SNP array (SNP-A) 6.0 (Affymetrix) in 48 patients diagnosed with APL on matched diagnosis and remission sample. Forty-six abnormalities were found as an acquired event in 23 patients (48%): 22 duplications, 23 deletions and 1 Copy-Neutral Loss of Heterozygocity (CN-LOH), being a duplication of 8(q24) (23%) and a deletion of 7(q33-qter) (6%) the most frequent copy-number abnormalities (CNA). Four patients (8%) showed CNAs adjacent to the breakpoints of the translocation. We compared our results with other APL series and found that, except for dup(8q24) and del(7q33-qter), ACA were infrequent (<= 3%) but most of them recurrent (70%). Interestingly, having CNA or FLT3 mutation were mutually exclusive events. Neither the number of CNA, nor any specific CNA was associated significantly with prognosis. This study has delineated recurrent abnormalities in addition to t(15; 17) that may act as secondary events and could explain leukemogenesis in up to 40% of APL cases with no ACA by conventional cytogenetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据