4.6 Review

MicroRNA-92a as a Potential Biomarker in Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088745

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81072147, NSFC 30940096]
  2. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education, China [20105503110001, 20125503110001]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education, China [[2011]508]
  4. Major Program of Chongqing Medical University [XBZD201006]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Scholars of Chongqing Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Previous studies demonstrated that MicroRNA-92a (miR-92a) was significantly differential expressed between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and control cohorts, which provide timely relevant evidence for miR-92a as a novel promising biomarker in the colorectal cancer patients. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate potential diagnostic value of plasma miR-92a. Methods: Relevant literatures were collected in PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Technology of Chongqing (VIP), and Wan Fang Data. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for miR-92a in the diagnosis of CRC were pooled using random effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to estimate the overall test performance. Results: This Meta-analysis included six studies with a total of 521 CRC patients and 379 healthy controls. For miR-92a, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR to predict CRC patients were 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72%-79%), 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59%-69%) and 8.05 (95% CI: 3.50-18.56), respectively. In addition, the AUC of miR-92a in diagnosis CRC is 0.7720. Conclusions: MicroRNA-92a might be a novel potential biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and more studies are needed to highlight the theoretical strengths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据