4.6 Article

Genome, Proteome and Structure of a T7-Like Bacteriophage of the Kiwifruit Canker Phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 3361-3379

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v7072776

关键词

biocontrol agent; kiwifruit; canker; Pseudomonas syringae pv; actinidiae; bacteriophage; cryo-electron microscopy; single particle reconstruction; genomics; proteomics; vB_PsyP_phiPsa17

类别

资金

  1. Rutherford Discovery Fellowship from the Royal Society of NZ
  2. Otago School of Medical Sciences Summer Research Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae is an economically significant pathogen responsible for severe bacterial canker of kiwifruit (Actinidia sp.). Bacteriophages infecting this phytopathogen have potential as biocontrol agents as part of an integrated approach to the management of bacterial canker, and for use as molecular tools to study this bacterium. A variety of bacteriophages were previously isolated that infect P. syringae pv. actinidiae, and their basic properties were characterized to provide a framework for formulation of these phages as biocontrol agents. Here, we have examined in more detail phi Psa17, a phage with the capacity to infect a broad range of P.syringae pv. actinidiae strains and the only member of the Podoviridae in this collection. Particle morphology was visualized using cryo-electron microscopy, the genome was sequenced, and its structural proteins were analysed using shotgun proteomics. These studies demonstrated that phi Psa17 has a 40,525 bp genome, is a member of the T7likevirus genus and is closely related to the pseudomonad phages phi PSA2 and gh-1. Eleven structural proteins (one scaffolding) were detected by proteomics and phi Psa17 has a capsid of approximately 60 nm in diameter. No genes indicative of a lysogenic lifecycle were identified, suggesting the phage is obligately lytic. These features indicate that phi Psa17 may be suitable for formulation as a biocontrol agent of P.syringae pv. actinidiae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据