4.6 Article

Lysophosphatidic Acid Acyltransferase Beta Regulates mTOR Signaling

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078632

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1CA131400-01A2]
  2. American Cancer Society [93-032-10]
  3. Shirley E. Noland Foundation, Melbourne, FL
  4. National Cancer Institute [P30-CA076292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase (LPAAT-beta) is a phosphatidic acid (PA) generating enzyme that plays an essential role in triglyceride synthesis. However, LPAAT-beta is now being studied as an important regulator of cell growth and differentiation and as a potential therapeutic target in cancer since PA is necessary for the activity of key proteins such as Raf, PKC-zeta and mTOR. In this report we determine the effect of LPAAT-beta silencing with siRNA in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines. We show for the first time that LPAAT-beta knockdown inhibits proliferation and anchorage-independent growth of pancreatic cancer cells. This is associated with inhibition of signaling by mTOR as determined by levels of mTORC1- and mTORC2-specific phosphorylation sites on 4E-BP1, S6K and Akt. Since PA regulates the activity of mTOR by modulating its binding to FKBP38, we explored the possibility that LPAAT-beta might regulate mTOR by affecting its association with FKBP38. Coimmunoprecipitation studies of FKBP38 with mTOR show increased levels of FKBP38 associated with mTOR when LPAAT-beta protein levels are knocked down. Furthermore, depletion of LPAAT-beta results in increased Lipin 1 nuclear localization which is associated with increased nuclear eccentricity, a nuclear shape change that is dependent on mTOR, further confirming the ability of LPAAT-beta to regulate mTOR function. Our results provide support for the hypothesis that PA generated by LPAAT-beta regulates mTOR signaling. We discuss the implications of these findings for using LPAAT-beta as a therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据