4.6 Article

Methylome Analysis and Epigenetic Changes Associated with Menarcheal Age

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079391

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU-Europe aid grant [CRIS 2009/223-507]
  2. Europe Against Cancer Program of the European Commission (SANCO)
  3. Denmark (Danish Cancer Society)
  4. France (Ligue centre le Cancer)
  5. France (Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale)
  6. France (Institut National de la Santeet de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM))
  7. Greece (Hellenic Ministry of Health)
  8. Greece (Stavros Niarchos Foundation )
  9. Greece (Hellenic Health Foundation)
  10. Germany (German Cancer Aid)
  11. Germany (German Cancer Research Center)
  12. Germany (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) [01-EA-9401]
  13. Italy (Italian Association for Research on Cancer)
  14. Italy (National Research Council)
  15. The Netherlands (Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS))
  16. The Netherlands (Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR))
  17. The Netherlands (LK Research Funds)
  18. The Netherlands (Dutch Prevention Funds)
  19. The Netherlands (Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland))
  20. The Netherlands (World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF))
  21. Spain (Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health) [Exp 96/0032]
  22. Sweden (Swedish Cancer Society)
  23. Sweden (Swedish Scientific Council)
  24. Sweden (Regional Government of Skane)
  25. United Kingdom (Cancer Research UK)
  26. United Kingdom (Medical Research Council UK)
  27. United Kingdom (Breast Cancer Campaign)
  28. Cancer Research UK [13086, 14136] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. Medical Research Council [G0401527, G1000143] Funding Source: researchfish
  30. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10114] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproductive factors have been linked to both breast cancer and DNA methylation, suggesting methylation as an important mechanism by which reproductive factors impact on disease risk. However, few studies have investigated the link between reproductive factors and DNA methylation in humans. Genome-wide methylation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 376 healthy women from the prospective EPIC study was investigated using LUminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA). Also, methylation of 458877 CpG sites was additionally investigated in an independent group of 332 participants of the EPIC-Italy sub-cohort, using the Infinium HumanMethylation 450 BeadChip. Multivariate logistic regression and linear models were used to investigate the association between reproductive risk factors and genome wide and CpG-specific DNA methylation, respectively. Menarcheal age was inversely associated with global DNA methylation as measured with LUMA. For each yearly increase in age at menarche, the risk of having genome wide methylation below median level was increased by 32% (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.53). When age at menarche was treated as a categorical variable, there was an inverse dose-response relationship with LUMA methylation levels (OR12-14vs.<= 11 yrs: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-3.17 and OR >= 15vs.<= 11 yrs: 4.59, 95% CI: 2.04-10.33; P for trend<0.0001). However, average levels of global methylation as measured by the Illumina technology were not significantly associated with menarcheal age. In locus by locus comparative analyses, only one CpG site had significantly different methylation depending on the menarcheal age category examined, but this finding was not replicated by pyrosequencing in an independent data set. This study suggests a link between age at menarche and genome wide DNA methylation, and the difference in results between the two arrays suggests that repetitive element methylation has a role in the association. Epigenetic changes may be modulated by menarcheal age, or the association may be a mirror of other important changes in early life that have a detectable effect on both methylation levels and menarcheal age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据