4.6 Article

The Neighborhood Energy Balance Equation: Does Neighborhood Food Retail Environment plus Physical Activity Environment = Obesity? The CARDIA Study

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085141

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  2. University of Alabama at Birmingham [HHSN268201300025C, HHSN268201300026C]
  3. Northwestern University [HHSN268201300027C]
  4. University of Minnesota [HHSN268201300028C]
  5. Kaiser Foundation Research Institute [HHSN268201300029C]
  6. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine [HHSN268200900041C]
  7. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  8. NIA [AG0005]
  9. NHLBI [AG0005]
  10. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL104580, R01- HL114091]
  11. UNC-CH Clinic Nutrition Research Center [NIH DK56350]
  12. Carolina Population Center [R24HD050924]
  13. University of Alabama at Birmingham Coordinating Center [N01-HC-95095]
  14. University of Alabama at Birmingham Field Center [N01-HC-48047]
  15. University of Minnesota Field Center [N01-HC-48048]
  16. Northwestern University Field Center [N01-HC-48049]
  17. Kaiser Foundation Research Institute from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [N01-HC-48050]
  18. Interdisciplinary Obesity Training postdoctoral fellowship [T32MH075854-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent obesity prevention initiatives focus on healthy neighborhood design, but most research examines neighborhood food retail and physical activity (PA) environments in isolation. We estimated joint, interactive, and cumulative impacts of neighborhood food retail and PA environment characteristics on body mass index (BMI) throughout early adulthood. Methods and Findings: We used cohort data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study [n=4,092; Year 7 (24-42 years, 1992-1993) followed over 5 exams through Year 25 (2010-2011); 12,921 person-exam observations], with linked time-varying geographic information system-derived neighborhood environment measures. Using regression with fixed effects for individuals, we modeled time-lagged BMI as a function of food and PA resource density (counts per population) and neighborhood development intensity (a composite density score). We controlled for neighborhood poverty, individual-level sociodemographics, and BMI in the prior exam; and included significant interactions between neighborhood measures and by sex. Using model coefficients, we simulated BMI reductions in response to single and combined neighborhood improvements. Simulated increase in supermarket density (from 25th to 75th percentile) predicted inter-exam reduction in BMI of 0.09 kg/m(2) [estimate (95% CI): -0.09 (-0.16, -0.02)]. Increasing commercial PA facility density predicted BMI reductions up to 0.22 kg/m(2) in men, with variation across other neighborhood features [estimate (95% CI) range: -0.14 (-0.29, 0.01) to -0.22 (-0.37, -0.08)]. Simultaneous increases in supermarket and commercial PA facility density predicted inter-exam BMI reductions up to 0.31 kg/m(2) in men [estimate (95% CI) range: -0.23 (-0.39, -0.06) to -0.31 (-0.47, -0.15)] but not women. Reduced fast food restaurant and convenience store density and increased public PA facility density and neighborhood development intensity did not predict reductions in BMI. Conclusions: Findings suggest that improvements in neighborhood food retail or PA environments may accumulate to reduce BMI, but some neighborhood changes may be less beneficial to women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据