4.6 Article

A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081046

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [0315528C]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [RTG1644]
  3. European Commission [222623]
  4. Gottingen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independent chromosome segments (Me). The aim of our study was to find a general deterministic equation for the average accuracy of genomic breeding values that also accounts for marker density and can be fitted empirically. Two data sets of similar to 698 Holstein Friesian bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and 19332 Brown Swiss bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and imputed to,600 K SNPs were available. Different k-fold (k = 2-10, 15, 20) cross-validation scenarios (50 replicates, random assignment) were performed using a genomic BLUP approach. A maximum likelihood approach was used to estimate the parameters of different prediction equations. The highest likelihood was obtained when using a modified form of the deterministic equation of Daetwyler et al. (2010), augmented by a weighting factor (w) based on the assumption that the maximum achievable accuracy is w < 1. The proportion of genetic variance captured by the complete SNP sets (w(2)) was 0.76 to 0.82 for Holstein Friesian and 0.72 to 0.75 for Brown Swiss. When modifying the number of SNPs, w was found to be proportional to the log of the marker density up to a limit which is population and trait specific and was found to be reached with,209000 SNPs in the Brown Swiss population studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据