4.6 Article

Friedreich Ataxia Patient Tissues Exhibit Increased 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Modification and Decreased CTCF Binding at the FXN Locus

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074956

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [242193/EFACTS]
  2. Wellcome Trust [089757]
  3. Ataxia UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is caused by a homozygous GAA repeat expansion mutation within intron 1 of the FXN gene, which induces epigenetic changes and FXN gene silencing. Bisulfite sequencing studies have identified 5-methylcytosine (5mC) DNA methylation as one of the epigenetic changes that may be involved in this process. However, analysis of samples by bisulfite sequencing is a time-consuming procedure. In addition, it has recently been shown that 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is also present in mammalian DNA, and bisulfite sequencing cannot distinguish between 5hmC and 5mC. Methodology/Principal Findings: We have developed specific MethylScreen restriction enzyme digestion and qPCR-based protocols to more rapidly quantify DNA methylation at four CpG sites in the FXN upstream GAA region. Increased DNA methylation was confirmed at all four CpG sites in both FRDA cerebellum and heart tissues. We have also analysed the DNA methylation status in FRDA cerebellum and heart tissues using an approach that enables distinction between 5hmC and 5mC. Our analysis reveals that the majority of DNA methylation in both FRDA and unaffected tissues actually comprises 5hmC rather than 5mC. We have also identified decreased occupancy of the chromatin insulator protein CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) at the FXN 5' UTR region in the same FRDA cerebellum tissues. Conclusions/Significance: Increased DNA methylation at the FXN upstream GAA region, primarily 5hmC rather than 5mC, and decreased CTCF occupancy at the FXN 5' UTR are associated with FRDA disease-relevant human tissues. The role of such molecular mechanisms in FRDA pathogenesis has now to be determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据