4.6 Article

Cerebroside C Increases Tolerance to Chilling Injury and Alters Lipid Composition in Wheat Roots

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073380

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB126100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901854, 81273487]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYZ201107]
  4. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303023]
  5. Open Research Fund Program of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pesticide Science [NYXKT201202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chilling tolerance was increased in seed germination and root growth of wheat seedlings grown in media containing 20 mu g/mL cerebroside C (CC), isolated from the endophytic Phyllosticta sp. TG78. Seeds treated with 20 mu g/mL CC at 4 degrees C expressed the higher germination rate (77.78%), potential (23.46%), index (3.44) and the shorter germination time (6.19 d); root growth was also significantly improved by 13.76% in length, 13.44% in fresh weight and 6.88% in dry mass compared to controls. During the cultivation process at 4 degrees C for three days and the followed 24 h at 25 degrees C, lipid peroxidation, expressed by malondialdehyde (MDA) content and relative membrane permeability (RMP) was significantly reduced in CC-treated roots; activities of lipoxygenase (LOX), phospholipid C (PLC) and phospholipid D (PLD) were inhibited by 13.62-62.26%, 13.54-63.93% and 13.90-61.17%, respectively; unsaturation degree of fatty acids was enhanced through detecting the contents of CC-induced linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitic acid and stearic acid using GC-MS; capacities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) were individually increased by 7.69-46.06%, 3.37-37.96%, and 27.00-178.07%. These results suggest that increased chilling tolerance may be due, in part, to the reduction of lipid peroxidation and alternation of lipid composition of roots in the presence of CC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据