4.6 Article

Kinetic Characterization of Exonuclease-Deficient Staphylococcus aureus PolC, a C-family Replicative DNA Polymerase

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063489

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01-GM080573]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PolC is the C-family replicative polymerase in low G+C content Gram-positive bacteria. To date several structures of C-family polymerases have been reported, including a high resolution crystal structure of a ternary complex of PolC with DNA and incoming deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP). However, kinetic information needed to understand the enzymatic mechanism of C-family polymerases is limited. For this study we have performed a detailed steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic characterization of correct dNTP incorporation by PolC from the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, using a construct lacking both the non-conserved N-terminal domain and the 3'-5' exonuclease domain (Sau-PolC-Delta N Delta Exo). We find that Sau-PolC-Delta N Delta Exo has a very fast catalytic rate (k(pol) 330 s(-1)) but also dissociates from DNA rapidly (k(off) -, 150 s(-1)), which explains the low processivity of PolC in the absence of sliding clamp processivity factor. Although Sau-PolC-Delta N Delta Exo follows the overall enzymatic pathway defined for other polymerases, some significant differences exist. The most striking feature is that the nucleotidyl transfer reaction for Sau-PolC-Delta N Delta Exo is reversible and is in equilibrium with dNTP binding. Simulation of the reaction pathway suggests that rate of pyrophosphate release, or a conformational change required for pyrophosphate release, is much slower than rate of bond formation. The significance of these findings is discussed in the context of previous data showing that binding of the beta-clamp processivity factor stimulates the intrinsic nucleotide incorporation rate of the C-family polymerases, in addition to increasing processivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据