4.6 Article

The Predictive Nature of Pseudoneglect for Visual Neglect: Evidence from Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wales Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)David Phillips Fellowship
  3. Biotechnology and BBSRC grant [BB/E020291/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/E020291/2, BB/C519854/1, BB/C519854/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C519854/2, BB/E020291/2, BB/C519854/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following parietal damage most patients with visual neglect bisect horizontal lines significantly away from the true centre. Neurologically intact individuals also misbisect lines; a phenomenon referred to as 'pseudoneglect'. In this study we examined the relationship between neglect and pseudoneglect by testing how patterns of pre-existing visuospatial asymmetry predict asymmetry caused by parietal interference. Twenty-four participants completed line bisection and Landmark tasks before receiving continuous theta burst stimulation to the left or right angular gyrus. Results showed that a pre-existing pattern of left pseudoneglect (i.e. right bias), but not right pseudoneglect, predicts left neglect-like behaviour during line bisection following right parietal cTBS. This correlation is consistent with the view that neglect and pseudoneglect arise via a common or linked neural mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据