4.6 Article

Bmi-1 Promotes Glioma Angiogenesis by Activating NF-κB Signaling

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055527

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81071762, 81071780, 81101680]
  2. National Science and Technique Major Project [201005022-2, 2012ZX09102101-017, 2012ZX10004213, 311030]
  3. Key Science and Technique Research Project of Guangdong Province [2010B030600003, 2009010058]
  4. Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province, China [S2011020002757]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis in glioma is associated with the poor prognosis of the disease and closely correlates with the highly invasive phenotype of glioma cells, which represents the most challenging impediment against the currently glioma treatments. Bmi-1, an onco-protein, has been implicated in the progression of various human cancers, including gliomas, whereas its role in glioma angiogenesis remains unclear. Our current study examined the effects of Bmi-1 on glioma angiogenesis in vitro as well as in vivo. We found that overexpression of Bmi-1 enhanced, whereas knockdown of Bmi-1 diminished, the capability of glioma cells to induce tubule formation and migration of endothelial cells and neovascularization in chicken chorioallantoic membrane. In vivo, Bmi-1 overexpression and knockdown, respectively, promoted and inhibited angiogenesis in orthotopically transplanted human gliomas. Furthermore, NF-kappa B activity and VEGF-C expression was induced by Bmi-1 overexpression, whereas Bmi-1 knockdown attenuated NF-kappa B signaling and decreased VEGF-C expression. Additionally suppression of NF-kappa B activity using a specific chemical inhibitor abrogated the NF-kappa B activation and the pro-angiogenic activities of glioma cells. Together, our data suggest that Bmi-1 plays an important role in glioma angiogenesis and therefore could represent a potential target for anti-angiogenic therapy against the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据