4.6 Article

Imatinib Ameliorates Neuroinflammation in a Rat Model of Multiple Sclerosis by Enhancing Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity and by Modulating the Peripheral Immune Response

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056586

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHR Foundation
  2. Wenner-Gren Fellowship
  3. Soderberg's Foundation
  4. AFA Foundation
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg's Foundation
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. LeDucq Foundation
  8. Swedish Brain Foundation
  9. Hallsten's Research Foundation
  10. Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA)
  11. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  12. Swedish Stroke Foundation
  13. Royal Swedish Agency
  14. Magnus Bergwall's Foundation
  15. Karolinska Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Central nervous system (CNS) disorders such as ischemic stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS) or Alzheimers disease are characterized by the loss of blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Here we demonstrate that the small tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib enhances BBB integrity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment was accompanied by decreased CNS inflammation and demyelination and especially reduced T-cell recruitment. This was supported by downregulation of the chemokine receptor (CCR) 2 in CNS and lymph nodes, and by modulation of the peripheral immune response towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Interestingly, imatinib ameliorated neuroinflammation, even when the treatment was initiated after the clinical manifestation of the disease. We have previously shown that imatinib reduces BBB disruption and stroke volume after experimentally induced ischemic stroke by targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor -alpha (PDGFR-alpha) signaling. Here we demonstrate that PDGFR-alpha signaling is a central regulator of BBB integrity during neuroinflammation and therefore imatinib should be considered as a potentially effective treatment for MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据