4.6 Article

Occurrence of Regulated and Emerging Iodinated DBPs in the Shanghai Drinking Water

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059677

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [30972438]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program in the 11th Five-Year Plan [2006BAI19B02]
  3. National High-Technology RD Program [2008AA062501-2, 2008ZX07421-004, 2013AA061804]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau Leading Academic Discipline Project [08GWD14]
  5. Non-Profit Foundation of National Health Ministry in the 12th Five Year Plan [2012BAJ25B05]
  6. Dawn Scholarship Project [07SG01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drinking water chlorination plays a pivotal role in preventing pathogen contamination against water-borne disease. However, chemical disinfection leads to the formation of halogenated disinfection by products (DBPs). Many DBPs are highly toxic and are of health concern. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive measurements of DBPs, including iodoacetic acid (IAA), iodoform (IF), nine haloacetic acids and four trihalomethanes in drinking waters from 13 water plants in Shanghai, China. The results suggested that IAA and IF were found in all the water treatment plants, with maximum levels of 1.66 mu g/L and 1.25 mu g/L for IAA and IF, respectively. Owing to deterioration of water quality, the Huangpu River has higher IAA and IF than the Yangtze River. Our results also demonstrated that low pH, high natural organic matter, ammonia nitrogen, and iodide in source waters increased IAA and IF formation. Compared to chlorine, chloramines resulted in higher concentration of iodinated DBP, but reduced the levels of trihalomethanes. This is the first study to reveal the widespread occurrence of IAA and IF in drinking water in China. The data provide a better understanding on the formation of iodinated disinfection byproducts and the findings should be useful for treatment process improvement and disinfection byproducts controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据