4.5 Article

Phylogeny of the reptilian Eimeria: are Choleoeimeria and Acroeimeria valid generic names?

期刊

ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 684-692

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12126

关键词

-

资金

  1. Organismo Autonomo de Parques Nacionales (Spain)
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CGL2012-40026-C02-01, CGL2012-40026-C02-02, CGL2011-24150, BES-2010-038427]
  3. Emerging Frontiers
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1241848] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reptiles are the animals with the most described coccidian species among all vertebrates. However, the co-evolutionary relationships in this host-parasite system have been scarcely studied. Paperna & Landsberg (South African Journal of Zoology, 24, 1989, 345) proposed the independent evolutionary origin of the Eimeria-like species isolated from reptiles based on morphological and developmental characteristics of their oocysts. Accordingly, they suggested the reclassification of these parasites in two new genera, Choleoeimeria and Acroeimeria. The validity of the genera proposed to classify reptilian Eimeria species remained unresolved due to the lack of species genetically characterized. In this study, we included 18S rRNA gene sequences from seven Eimeria-like species isolated from five different lizard host families. The phylogenetic analyses confirmed the independent evolutionary origin of the Eimeria-like species infecting lizards. Within this group, most species were placed into two monophyletic clades. One of them included the species with ellipsoidal oocysts (i.e. Choleoeimeria-like oocysts), whereas the species with more spheroidal oocysts (i.e. Acroeimeria-like oocysts) were included in the second one. This result supports the taxonomic validity of the genera Acroeimeria and Choleoeimeria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据