4.4 Article

Reptiles of Chubut province, Argentina: richness, diversity, conservation status and geographic distribution maps

期刊

ZOOKEYS
卷 -, 期 498, 页码 103-126

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.498.7476

关键词

Biogeography; diversity; herpetofauna; conservation; central Patagonia; Argentina

类别

资金

  1. CONICET fellowship
  2. ANPCYT [FONCYT PICT 2006-00506, 33789, 2011-0784, 1397]
  3. ANPCYT (CONICET) [PEI 2001-6397, PIP 2005-6469]
  4. Brigham Young University
  5. National Science Foundation grant Partnership for International Research and Education award [OISE 0530267]
  6. Monte L. Bean Museum, College of Agriculture and Biology, Department of Biology, Kennedy Center for International Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate estimation of species and population geographic ranges is essential for species-focused studies and conservation and management plans. Knowledge of the geographic distributions of reptiles from Patagonian Argentina is in general limited and dispersed over manuscripts from a wide variety of topics. We completed an extensive review of reptile species of central Patagonia (Argentina) based on information from a wide variety of sources. We compiled and checked geographic distribution records from published literature and museum records, including extensive new data from the LJAMM-CNP (CENPAT-CONICET) herpetological collection. Our results show that there are 52 taxa recorded for this region and the highest species richness was seen in the families Liolaemidae and Dipsadidae with 31 and 10 species, respectively. The Patagonica was the phytogeographic province most diverse in species and Phymaturus was the genus of conservation concern most strongly associated with it. We present a detailed species list with geographical information, richness species, diversity analyses with comparisons across phytogeographical provinces, conservation status, taxonomic comments and distribution maps for all of these taxa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据